dos. William Camden, Historie . (London area, 1630), III, pp. 61-62; Jerome Elizabeth. Brooks, Tobacco: its Record Depicted . from the Collection off George Arents (5 vols., Nyc, 1937-52), We, pp. 46-49; II, pp. 156-158; R. Letter. Salaman, The real history and you can Public Influence of your Potato (Cambridge, 1949), pp. 83-96; Quinn, Roanoke Voyages , I, pp. 344-348.
BIGGES, WALTER. A beneficial Summarie and you may True Discourse out of Sir Frances [sic] Drakes West Indian Voyage. (First-line off term and some statements trimmed.) With woodcut printer’s draw out of Richard Occupation toward name. 4 simply leaves, 37 (1) pp., step 1 blank leaf. Brief quarto. Morocco.
Next ENGLISH Edition, had written an identical season because very first. The current Roger Ward release seems to be smaller well known compared to Richard Job release (STC 3056) and therefore preceded it the same season–see the earlier amount. STC-Bishop-Ramage to acquire simply cuatro duplicates of the Ward model as facing eleven of Community. The current content comes with the leaf till the title, blank with the exception of the new signature-mark “A beneficial,” plus the empty leaf towards the bottom.
F.” try sent to ocean for the February cuatro, 1589, for the true purpose of reconnoitering the fresh new Iberian coasts in preparation getting the brand new Drake-Norris trip regarding 1589
STC 3057; Sabin 20841; Church 136 (note); Oceans (ed.), Correct and Perfecte Newes . Syr Frauncis Drake , pp. 53-70; Quinn, ed., The fresh new Roanoke Voyages , We, pp. 32-35.
“T. The guy gets news of the fate of the Invincible Armada of the earlier 12 months: “So when in regards to the past Fleete, [an effective marchant from Lisbone] sayth, that the boats and carvels of the Language Fleete there are come home but nine and thirtie. but most of all of the people you to definitely came household passed away immediatly from the its obtaining. Along with the Duke from Medina try banished brand new Legal for ever.” So it latter outline is fairly false–Queen Philip failed to fault the fresh Duke towards inability out-of the newest Armada strategy. The guy as well as provides particulars of an excellent naval action regarding Lisbon datingranking.net/tr/alua-inceleme/ for the hence good Greek vessel laden up with drink off Crete is captured, and forecasts higher success with the coming attack.
(WINGFIELD, ANTHONY). A true Coppie regarding a discourse authored by a gentleman, in the new late Voyage out of Spaine and you may Portingale. 2 renders, 58 pp., step 1 empty leaf. (Pp. 27-29 devoid of, supplied in the photostat.) Woodcut vignette to your name. Short quarto. Dated boards, leather-based right back.
Very first Release, First Issue. Wingfield’s narrative is considered the most detail by detail membership extant of 1589 attack to your Spain asked from the Sir Francis Drake and Sir John Norreys (Norris), and therefore sailed away from Plymouth toward April 17, 1589, and came back later within the June. Although not, an enthusiastic unnumbered afterwards number gets Wingfield just like the author. 1
The fresh new trip hit a brick wall within its dominating purpose, this new elevating regarding a beneficial rebellion inside the A holiday in greece against Queen Philip II regarding The country of spain, while the enthroning away from Dom Antonio, the past men offshoot of one’s Aviz dynasty, in Philip’s set. They did some problems for Foreign-language naval distribution from the Corunna, and particular marks of your Armada of previous 12 months; as well as over sixty vessels laden with corn and naval offers and that the fresh English thought to be contraband had been pulled near Lisbon about Hanse.
On the STC the ebook try wrongly ascribed to King Elizabeth’s favorite, Robert Devereux, Earl off Essex, which took part in the brand new trip–far contrary to the Queen’s commonly–just like the a voluntary
Two issues of this work are extant; signature E (pp. 25-32), which relates events of the attack upon Lisbon, in some copies (including this one) contains a passage in praise of the Earl of Essex on p. 26 (E
1 verso). As Queen Elizabeth was highly displeased with the Earl’s running off on this voyage against her orders, it is perhaps likely that the issue with the passage is the earlier of the two.